|
|
|
|
The United States of
America, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pridger Stands firmly behind the Silent Majority Unfortunately, Pridger doesn't have much faith in the Silent Majority's present willingness or ability to see the light at the end of the tunnel, hear the sounds of the approaching train, nor pass on any alarm. |
|
|
|
 |
|
A Life Non-Member of the ACLU |
Life Member of APA-ACLU |
| The ACLU takes on
some pretty worthy causes from time to time, but by in large it is
nothing more than an agent and advocate of American cultural decline.
It acts most often as a "spoiler's advocate" thwarting the
legitimate will of the majority, on behalf of anti-Christian spoilers.
It fights tooth and nail to protect the public from the corrosive
influences of religion, and fights equally hard to thwart the
majority's prerogatives to invoke any sort of common decency rules in
the public arena. It seeks to protect the public from being exposed to
the Ten Commandments, lest a miniscule minority be offended by such
admonitions as "Thou shalt not kill," steal, covet, etc. It
cares not, however, how many people are rightly offended and outraged
by obscene and abusive language in every venue of public entertainment,
making it literally impossible to shelter children from its
outrageously corrosive influences. It vigorously defends this, as well
as the most insidious kinds of professionally produced pornography, as
"freedom of expression." It semi-skillfully uses the First
Amendment of the Constitution (as the ACLU itself chooses to
interpreter it), as its "authority" to beat up on the
majority and raise to prominence and respectability the most profane
minorities. In the guise of protecting minorities from the
"tyranny of the majority," it has effectively (through
litigation and threats of litigation), institutionalized a
"tyranny of the minorities" thus rendering the very notion of
democracy in America nothing more than a quaint anachronism.
The ACLU has no truck with God, because it would diminish their power to acknowledge a higher or more intelligent authority. They would expunge God, as well as all religion, from the national identity if they could. They believe the notion that this is a "Nation Under God" is an archaic abomination. Apparently, they are for Government, Omnipotent, and Deified (G.O.D.), wherein government usurps the position our wise founders reserved to God alone. The ACLU would deprive us of God given rights, and leave us only with government decreed or licensed privileges. If the ACLU agenda prevails, the Almighty Government in Washington, (or Geneva), would be the closest thing to a "heavenly father" (or mother), we'd have. The ACLU is advertising for new members. They want members of what they call the "saving remnant" — to save us from God and religion. Ironically, the "saving remnant" idea was taken from the Bible, and its meaning was exactly opposite to the ACLU usage. Pridger |
|
|
As long as Christians are in the majority, he stands for the right to post the Ten Commandments on public property, so long as the Commandments aren't engineered to pop out and clobber anybody over the head, or otherwise violate their persons, and nobody is forced to kneel meekly before them and pray. Pridger believes "God is great, God is Good" and that school children should be encouraged (but not forced), to "thank Him for their food." Atheists and agnostics, of course, should have (and always have had), the right either remain in respectful silence, or to substitute "G.O.D." (Government, Omnipotent, and Deified), or "ADM" (Archer Daniels Midland), in place of the word God, and "Them" in place of Him. When Buddhists become the majority, they can post the Noble Eight-Fold Path. When Atheists become the majority, they can post whatever the majority of Atheists want to post. Maybe God jokes. |
|
|
|
|
| Pridger believes in the right to keep and bear arms — and that it is a God given right. It is not bestowed by, but merely guaranteed and protected by, the Second Amendment to the Constitution. The primary purpose of the right has little to do with the term "militia," though the Militia is all of the people willing and able to bear arms. It has everything to do with the right of "We The people" to defend ourselves, whether from personal attack, foreign invasion, or from tyranny of the state. Yes, even our own government should it betray its Constitution and legitimacy. | |
